Yes. I like your thinking. The whole experiment is flawed from the outset, with that huge yawning gap between three episodes and all the episodes, and the presentation of the data is highly unsatisfactory. I like your version much better.

The idea itself is also flawed though, since they've let people add to the list willy-nilly. This not only means that everybody could conceivably have a different list, but the list itself has become quite unwieldy, and I imagine that a lot of people don't bother to read it properly, which doesn't do much for individual people presenting their own data. There should be a standardised list. What we have here is a bizarre mixture, with some very odd inclusions, and some equally odd omissions. It needs some proper organising!