Fall of Eagles (mini picspam)
Feb. 3rd, 2012 09:29 pmI've been watching the BBC's 1974 drama Fall of Eagles lately (in between the Shakespeare and things). Yes, guess whose IMBD I found it on? But when I saw that it was about the fall of the three big European royal houses at the turn of the century, I was immediately v interested. And then I saw that it had everybody ever in it, so I had to watch it. As history lessons go, it is pretty painless & I will picspam it properly when I've finished it because it has people like Gemma Jones (Spooks) and Colin Baker (he is playing Crown Prince Willie, I gather, but he hasn't turned up yet) and lovely costumes and locations, and I will do it to save you watching TV that is nearly 40 years old because I am a nuisance kind like that. Oh, and btw, Patrick Stewart is Lenin.
Anyway, today has not been the greatest of days, so I was much cheered to reach the first of David Collings's two episodes, and also the first ep for the rest of the Russian contingent...

I like the smoking jacket quite a bit. I think you are getting this post in honour of the green smoking jacket, really.

He is playing Pavel Milyukov, here with Witte (Freddie Jones), who he is trying to persuade to talk to the Tsar about reforms, and having a parliament before it is TOO LATE. (Srsly, people, if you have David Collings giving you advice in a drama, you should take it. Like: "Stop these bounty hunter games or somebody's going to get hurt." or "We should totally kill Antony, or at least not let him talk." or "Let's leave right now and NOT take that woman with us." or "Level 7 is a really, really bad idea and we might destroy everything." or "I don't think these stowaways committed the murder..." This only works when he isn't evil and/or stupid, of course. But you would think people would learn.)
To which Witte says he should take care: "There are darker minds at work than yours, Professor!"

And here is said darker mind. Patrick Stewart as Lenin. (Well, nobody knows he's Lenin yet; it's only 1894.)
So I was pleased it was quite a cool role, as he acts as Lenin's opposite in the structure of the episode, with them getting two scenes each as the two voices for change, one moderate, one radical. (He has another episode, but that's not till 1916.)
And, onto the important matter... do you think the moustache is real or fake? Or fake on film and real in studio? (I can never tell, not unless it is madly wrong, or actually falls off.)
(I promise to come back with a proper picspam, because, as I said, everyone ever, and Gemma Jones was amazing as Princess Vicky, the best person in it so far, but I'll wait till Colin has turned up.)
Anyway, today has not been the greatest of days, so I was much cheered to reach the first of David Collings's two episodes, and also the first ep for the rest of the Russian contingent...

I like the smoking jacket quite a bit. I think you are getting this post in honour of the green smoking jacket, really.

He is playing Pavel Milyukov, here with Witte (Freddie Jones), who he is trying to persuade to talk to the Tsar about reforms, and having a parliament before it is TOO LATE. (Srsly, people, if you have David Collings giving you advice in a drama, you should take it. Like: "Stop these bounty hunter games or somebody's going to get hurt." or "We should totally kill Antony, or at least not let him talk." or "Let's leave right now and NOT take that woman with us." or "Level 7 is a really, really bad idea and we might destroy everything." or "I don't think these stowaways committed the murder..." This only works when he isn't evil and/or stupid, of course. But you would think people would learn.)
To which Witte says he should take care: "There are darker minds at work than yours, Professor!"

And here is said darker mind. Patrick Stewart as Lenin. (Well, nobody knows he's Lenin yet; it's only 1894.)
So I was pleased it was quite a cool role, as he acts as Lenin's opposite in the structure of the episode, with them getting two scenes each as the two voices for change, one moderate, one radical. (He has another episode, but that's not till 1916.)
And, onto the important matter... do you think the moustache is real or fake? Or fake on film and real in studio? (I can never tell, not unless it is madly wrong, or actually falls off.)
(I promise to come back with a proper picspam, because, as I said, everyone ever, and Gemma Jones was amazing as Princess Vicky, the best person in it so far, but I'll wait till Colin has turned up.)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-04 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-04 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-04 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-04 10:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-05 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-06 03:08 pm (UTC)I'm so glad it wasn't just me that made that mistake! ;)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-06 08:33 pm (UTC)Yes, these days it's all looking pretty, plenty of sex and um, probably dancing and fighting. Maybe. :lol:
no subject
Date: 2012-02-04 01:24 pm (UTC)But yes, if David Collings tells you to do something in a drama where he isn't playing an obvious incompetent or baddie, than I don't care if you are Autocrat of all the Russias, you should pay attention. Great smoking jacket, too. :)
Stewart's Lenin beard looks real to me too, but I wonder if he's wearing a hairpiece - I have no idea how bald he was in 1974, but he was certainly as bald as he was in Star Trek by the time of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy which was only a few years later. But then again, I never caught on that Roger Delgado was wearing a "piece" until About Time informed me of it, not even when the Master is sporting what is by his standards some *big* 70s hair in things like Frontier in Space. ;D But yes, Stewart has that sort of Lenin look to him - not that he looks particularly like him, really, but they both have very distinctive faces, and it's something about the eyes I think...
Anyway, I hope it wasn't too bad a day for you and that things will continue to improve in future. But in the meantime it's good to have something to cheer you up. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-05 07:48 pm (UTC)Anyway, this series is quite cool and the casting is epic - it's not as good as Elizabeth R, but if you're in it for the history (and spotting the full quota of 1970s BBC actors) you might like it. Its cast is so epic that the back of the DVD has three lines of people 'starring' in it, without even mentioning that Michael Hordern is doing the narration. (It has narration, which feels v strange - ep 1 has a lot, and I was wondering if it was going to turn out to be more of a docu-drama, but it's much less intrusive after. And some of the ways they've threaded in contemporary images is quite cool. But it's a thing that definitely looks odd to modern eyes!)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-07 08:54 pm (UTC)Michael Hordern was the go-to guy for that kind of thing, wasn't he? I'm reminded of the Kubrick film Barry Lyndon, where he provides a particularly fine example. I'll be honest, though, the main thing intriguing me as I glance at your write-up again is the idea of Baker, C, playing a no-good Hohenzollern, hopefully in a similar style to his Blakes 7 appearance. ;D
no subject
Date: 2012-02-07 09:15 pm (UTC)Oh, I am useless at hair. They're probably right; I think I'll just not think about it, as I'll never be any the wiser unless it's really obvious or something. But I tended to end up not reading their facts sections because they were so dodgy. And if even I noticed, they must have been. I think part of it was the typos, rather than anything else.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-08 09:30 pm (UTC)Well, as I say, last I time I saw Frontier in Space (or it might have The Time Monster, come to think of it), it literally jumped out at me. And then I read the hairpiece allegation and it all seemed to make sense... But yes, the essays are the best bits, I think. I splashed out on the second edition of the Three volume, and a bit later got the Two and Six/Seven ones. So...still more to get, but I've enjoyed them so far. Thanks very much indeed for recommending them (and sending me the original Three book!) in the first place. :) You're right about the typos, though.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-08 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-05 09:04 pm (UTC)Hmm, lemme think. No, don't tell me...I know the answer... Is it, could it possibly be...David Collings'?!
And I don't know this series at all! The BBC did a lot of good stuff though. ::makes note to go check it out::
And yes, people should take David Collings' advice! Especially when he phrases said advice like that!
no subject
Date: 2012-02-06 08:31 pm (UTC)It's good, but definitely one for history lovers, and also if you like 1970s BBC actor-spotting. I'm enjoying it anyway, although I'm going through it quite slowly. Each episode is quite separate, in some ways.