Friending Meme
Jan. 31st, 2016 12:53 pmThere are former LJers who would like to return, but their friends lists have been deserted.
Let's all welcome them back with open arms and show them that LJ is very much alive!
It looked a bit scary (it's all LJ, not necessarily just fannish folks), but I ignored the questions I didn't want to answer and plunged in, because people should definitely be encouraged to return to LJ. Also new friends are not to be sneezed at. :-)

no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 02:03 pm (UTC)New people.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 05:23 pm (UTC)And, heh, I'm pretty sure you must have friended me once. I am quite terrible about friending myself except on occasions when I'm not. Also I promise only to friend people who seem nice! (Anyone who wants to friend me despite my confessions about going on about beige 70s TV is probably definitely nice, right?) ;-p
(Oh, and btw, am watching Sleepy Hollow, which is indeed good fun. I have decided though that as it is an AU where demons walk the earth, that explains why history is so completely random there.)
no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 08:02 pm (UTC)Also I was amused that somewhere in episode 1 he says something like "evil has found a new place to live!" And I was, aha, yes, it must have been having trouble ever since someone blew up Sunnydale that one time...
But, yes, provided a person doesn't pay any attention to the history, it's being good fun so far, thank you!
no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 08:37 pm (UTC)Hmm... SH/Buffy crossover...
no subject
Date: 2016-02-01 10:04 pm (UTC)If Sleepy Hollow didn't have such engaging leads, it would be terrible. It's not even trying in the slightest, lol. I don't actually go round looking at everything complaining about accuracy because most of the time I can't remember enough to say. But it is a terrible curse, almost as bad as having read the book before watching the adaptation and needing to throw things.
I don't think you did ever mention you did history though - which periods did you study? (Mine were fairly random because I did joint honours and had to chose things that didn't clash with the essential Information & Library Studies modules, and it really limited my selection. But I did have a marvellous US lecturer who did Colonial America. *side-eyes Sleepy Hollow again*)
no subject
Date: 2016-02-02 08:22 am (UTC)I did modern history, which was essentially defined as being from around 1700 onward (we even had a quick look at the Falklands War, which was scary! It's not history if I remember it, damn it!) I did get to do a course in Mediaeval history in the first year though, which was good. The modules weren't bad. I did a crash course on 20th century European affairs, which was compulsory; and then the history of the Soviet Union; Nazi Germany; Southern Africa (that one was good - I'd never been out of Europe for history before); Black America (also good); and Crime and Punishment in England and Wales, which was also rather good. And the history of agriculture in England from 1640 - 1870, which was the dullest thing that ever was dull. :)
no subject
Date: 2016-02-02 12:58 pm (UTC)Aw, that was much mor defined than me. For A-Level I did Democracies & Totalitarian States (one the first year, the other the second), which is... a theme. :loL: But for university, as I said, I did whatever didn't clash with ILS and allowed me to get across the Waunfawr to the other campus in time. (There was one where there was only a ten minute gap which involved much speedy cycling and me being thankful I was going downhill at the end or I'd never have done it. As you sort of know Aber, you'll know that it doesn't do hills by halves!) That sounds like a good solid overview, with a broader sweep than anything I managed. I was sort of WWI here, Colonel America, 19th C America, Roman Britain, Non-Comformity in Britain 1700-1900 ish, and a very dull economic history of Britain in the 20th C, but your ag. one sounds even more so. (Although I am also interested at the same time, because with my family history head on, I can see that now being helpful. If still not exciting. Did you do well in it? The only time I ever got a first in history was with the Economic module I didn't understand and didn't like. I don't understand marking.) I would have liked to do some Chinese history, but it wasn't offered (well, it wasn't offered anywhere I applied to!) and European history, especially medieval and early modern to get a better understanding of context really. But I kept winding up in America again.
no subject
Date: 2016-02-03 04:46 pm (UTC)I don't really recall what mark I got overall for Agrarian England. Sixty-something percent, iirc. I got a 2.1 over all, and got much the same for the various modules. Something of a relief, as I was envisaging horrors from that one. It was DULL. Did tie in nicely with GCSE and A Level though, both of which were 'A Social & Economic History of Britain from 1760' (the A Level also covered Europe). I have read more about seed drills, and the industrialisation of farming practices, than I could ever have desired!
no subject
Date: 2016-02-03 05:38 pm (UTC)US history is interesting, of course - I just wanted to do something different at the time. But Colonial America was great, because we had this lecturer called Dr Schlenther who was just one of the most fun, interesting and nice history lecturers we ever had. He made us sing psalms unaccompanied like Puritans and told us about one Governor of somewhere who used to like to dress up as a woman daily and even had his portrait painted that way. Because he was, he said, representing Queen Anne, so, naturally he had to look the part... :-D
If I am stuck on my ag labs in my family history, I shall come to you, asking about seed drills!!
no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-02-01 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 07:12 pm (UTC)I mean, yes, I could just ignore them, but being asked in the first place already makes it weird. Those aren't the kinds of things I care about when looking for new book/Doctor Who stuff to follow.
It's a nice idea in general and I did find a couple of people to add, but. . .
no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 11:13 am (UTC)I have been making an effort to friend people and at least get an active reading list again, but it still tends to be friends of friends and things. Completely random is too intimidating.
no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 12:48 pm (UTC)Speaking of which, since you're here & I know you from fic_rush and from that lovely Heyer ficlet you wrote during my commentfest, we may only overlap here & there, but would you mind me friending you? Or is that still a little too random?
no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 01:05 pm (UTC)*The more obscure fandom half, to be fair.
no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 03:12 pm (UTC)My reading is fairly random, though, or would be if I had any time for it (I'm working full time and studying part time and pretending I have a life as well, and it's all a bit hectic...)
no subject
Date: 2016-02-05 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 08:34 pm (UTC)*HUGS*
no subject
Date: 2016-02-01 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-31 11:17 pm (UTC)http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-35455932
no subject
Date: 2016-02-01 09:59 pm (UTC)