What i've Been Reading Wednesday
Nov. 14th, 2018 12:29 pmOn a Wednesday and before it's been much more than a month since the last! I'm still rather weird about reading, but heigh-ho.
What I've finished reading
Since last time, I've finished David Olusoga's Black & British: A Forgotten History, which was excellent. (Indeed, I meant to get it and save reading or consulting it for later, but once I'd opened the book, I was sucked in and there I was, reading another 500+ page history book, which I had very much intended not to be doing in order to try and unweird myself (save in daily bits for family history note-taking), but what can you do sometimes?)
Talking of which, I also came to the end of The Weaker Vessel by Antonia Fraser, which was overall very good and useful, although it has to be said, that it contained a lot more exciting women in the pre-Civil War and Civil War period, and the Restoration could not quite compete, but that's hardly the fault of the book.
In general, because of being weird, I've been trying to unweird myself with inconsequential Regencies, which have been variable as ever. But I did also read one of the British Library's Golden Age reprints, this time Quick Curtain by Alan Melville, which as the introduction points out, is almost more of a parody of a crime novel than a crime novel, and so it was. It was a theatrical setting by an author from the industry, and I'm always up for a parody and theatrical people sending themselves up, so it was entertaining and easy to read. I did wish the detective and his son would stop with the double act, though. I wanted to thwack them with a rolled up newspaper after the first chapter, although they were okay when they split up. But it was a very easy read and pretty enjoyable exercise in genre subversion.
(The introduction also mentioned Death at Broadcasting House, which reminded me that I recorded the 1934 film off Talking Pictures (how could I not with that title), but this is not much of a sidenote as I still haven't watched it.)
I also read Excellent Women by Barbara Pym, which I did enjoy a lot, even though I was a little too tired to cope to begin with. Thanks to the people who both recced her and warned me the Angela Thirkell comparison was a little off, because while I can see the connection, those two things are not the same indeed, no.
What I am Reading Now
Sixteenth-Century England by Joyce Youings, for family history purposes, plus another Regency for the fluff value. I am about four pages into the former and have made notes about farming, so there's not much more to say. It's an older title, but hasn't yet been supplanted, so is a good place to start.
Some occasional secret Yuletide-y stuff, but nothing that is not a re-read.
What I'm Reading Next
I don't know! But I did get Jane and Prudence by Barbara Pym from the library when my friend took me last week, so hopefully I'll be able to muster up the strength to read it soon. I don't know, the unweirding myself is not really happening. I need a bit of a run of better days to regain stamina or a book that magically works and I'm not getting that yet. So, who knows?
What I've finished reading
Since last time, I've finished David Olusoga's Black & British: A Forgotten History, which was excellent. (Indeed, I meant to get it and save reading or consulting it for later, but once I'd opened the book, I was sucked in and there I was, reading another 500+ page history book, which I had very much intended not to be doing in order to try and unweird myself (save in daily bits for family history note-taking), but what can you do sometimes?)
Talking of which, I also came to the end of The Weaker Vessel by Antonia Fraser, which was overall very good and useful, although it has to be said, that it contained a lot more exciting women in the pre-Civil War and Civil War period, and the Restoration could not quite compete, but that's hardly the fault of the book.
In general, because of being weird, I've been trying to unweird myself with inconsequential Regencies, which have been variable as ever. But I did also read one of the British Library's Golden Age reprints, this time Quick Curtain by Alan Melville, which as the introduction points out, is almost more of a parody of a crime novel than a crime novel, and so it was. It was a theatrical setting by an author from the industry, and I'm always up for a parody and theatrical people sending themselves up, so it was entertaining and easy to read. I did wish the detective and his son would stop with the double act, though. I wanted to thwack them with a rolled up newspaper after the first chapter, although they were okay when they split up. But it was a very easy read and pretty enjoyable exercise in genre subversion.
(The introduction also mentioned Death at Broadcasting House, which reminded me that I recorded the 1934 film off Talking Pictures (how could I not with that title), but this is not much of a sidenote as I still haven't watched it.)
I also read Excellent Women by Barbara Pym, which I did enjoy a lot, even though I was a little too tired to cope to begin with. Thanks to the people who both recced her and warned me the Angela Thirkell comparison was a little off, because while I can see the connection, those two things are not the same indeed, no.
What I am Reading Now
Sixteenth-Century England by Joyce Youings, for family history purposes, plus another Regency for the fluff value. I am about four pages into the former and have made notes about farming, so there's not much more to say. It's an older title, but hasn't yet been supplanted, so is a good place to start.
Some occasional secret Yuletide-y stuff, but nothing that is not a re-read.
What I'm Reading Next
I don't know! But I did get Jane and Prudence by Barbara Pym from the library when my friend took me last week, so hopefully I'll be able to muster up the strength to read it soon. I don't know, the unweirding myself is not really happening. I need a bit of a run of better days to regain stamina or a book that magically works and I'm not getting that yet. So, who knows?
no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-15 04:04 pm (UTC)Ack, that sounds like a wretched and difficult place to be. :/ I hope you can untangle yourself from it.
no subject
Date: 2018-11-15 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 02:18 pm (UTC)I look forward to your writeup when you get to it! I see it has Ian Hunter, Henry Kendall, Jack Hawkins, and Val Gielgud himself.
no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 02:31 pm (UTC)The 'Black and British' book sounds good:)
no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 05:31 pm (UTC)And murder at the Beeb! How could a person resist?
no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 09:36 pm (UTC)Sir Bonamy would make a good intelligence agent, but Lady Denville would sort of be one by accident
Well that would be the fun of it!
no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-14 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-15 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-16 08:39 pm (UTC)"...Brahms and Simon started to write comic thrillers together. The first, A Bullet in the Ballet, had its genesis in a frivolous fantasy spun by the collaborators when Brahms was deputising for Arnold Haskell as dance critic of The Daily Telegraph. Brahms proposed a murder mystery set in the ballet world with Haskell as the corpse. Simon took the suggestion as a joke, but Brahms insisted that they press ahead with the plot (although Haskell was not a victim in the finished work). The book introduced the phlegmatic Inspector Adam Quill and the excitable members of Vladimir Stroganoff's ballet company, who later reappeared in three more books between 1938 and 1945."
no subject
Date: 2018-11-17 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-17 10:18 am (UTC)"...Brahms and Simon went back to Elizabethan times, with No Bed for Bacon (1941). ...The plot concerns a young woman who disguises herself as a boy to gain membership of Richard Burbage's and William Shakespeare's, theatrical company (a device later employed by Tom Stoppard as the central plot of his 1999 screenplay Shakespeare in Love)."
no subject
Date: 2018-11-17 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-17 04:53 pm (UTC)I also watched one episode of the Vanity Fair in which Phillip Glenister is Dobbin (miscast, wouldn't you say?) so seeing him in Island at War made me blink and wonder who made Gene Hunt a Baron.
no subject
Date: 2018-11-18 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-18 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-18 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-25 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-11-25 08:48 pm (UTC)